Structuring performance review templates with LLMs

When structuring performance review templates using Large Language Models (LLMs), it’s important to design a format that is both comprehensive and adaptable, ensuring that key areas of employee performance are covered while allowing room for nuanced feedback. Here’s how to approach structuring performance review templates, along with a framework that integrates LLMs for customization and efficiency:

1. Basic Information Section

Start with a standard header that includes essential employee details. While LLMs can auto-fill some of these fields, they can also help in formatting the information for consistency.

• Employee Name:

• Job Title:

• Department:

• Review Period:

• Reviewer:

• Date of Review:

2. Performance Summary

This section is an overview of the employee’s general performance over the review period. Here, LLMs can assist in generating summaries based on data collected from multiple sources (e.g., project reports, manager notes, peer feedback). It should encompass strengths, areas for improvement, and overall contributions.

Template Example:

• Strengths:

  • Brief summary of key strengths observed.

• Areas for Improvement:

  • Concise feedback on areas where the employee can improve.

LLM Usage:

• Auto-summarization: LLMs can process raw feedback data and summarize key points effectively.

• Tone and Language Adjustment: LLMs can ensure feedback is constructive and balanced, avoiding overly critical or overly positive language.

3. Core Competencies

Evaluate the employee’s performance in specific areas critical to their role. For example:

• Technical Skills:

  • Rating scale (e.g., 1-5)

  • LLMs can automatically suggest improvement areas based on project or task performance.

• Communication:

  • Rating scale (e.g., 1-5)

  • The LLM can suggest feedback based on communication frequency, clarity, and effectiveness.

• Problem Solving & Innovation:

  • Rating scale (e.g., 1-5)

  • LLMs can help identify specific instances where innovation was demonstrated or areas where problem-solving could improve.

• Leadership/Collaboration:

  • Rating scale (e.g., 1-5)

  • Depending on the employee’s role, LLMs can identify leadership traits or collaboration skills based on feedback patterns.

LLM Usage:

• Customized Feedback Generation: LLMs can assess employee performance based on quantitative data (e.g., completion rates, deadlines met) and qualitative inputs (e.g., peer reviews), and automatically generate relevant feedback for each competency area.

4. Goal Achievement

In this section, outline the goals set at the previous review and evaluate the employee’s progress. LLMs can pull data from prior reviews, personal performance dashboards, or even auto-generate goal-setting suggestions for the next review period.

Template Example:

• Previous Goals:

  • List of goals from the last review period.

• Progress:

  • Describes the progress made on each goal (completed, in progress, not met).

• New Goals:

  • Goals for the next review period, with specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART) objectives.

LLM Usage:

• Goal Tracking: LLMs can generate SMART goals based on past performance or key business objectives.

• Progress Analytics: LLMs can summarize progress toward goals with concise language based on project completion rates or performance data.

5. Peer and Self-Assessment

Including peer feedback and self-assessment can provide a well-rounded view of an employee’s performance. LLMs can assist by:

• Summarizing Peer Feedback: Automatically generating summaries from peer input.

• Generating Self-Assessment Prompts: LLMs can suggest questions to encourage thoughtful self-assessments.

Template Example:

• Self-Assessment:

  • Prompt for the employee to assess their own performance (e.g., “What do you consider your biggest achievements this period?”).

• Peer Feedback:

  • A section for summarizing feedback from colleagues or team members.

LLM Usage:

• Peer Feedback Analysis: LLMs can aggregate feedback from multiple sources and generate key themes or insights.

• Self-Assessment Refinement: LLMs can suggest areas to reflect on based on prior reviews or job expectations.

6. Training & Development Needs

Identify areas where the employee may benefit from additional training or professional development. LLMs can help suggest relevant courses, resources, or mentorship opportunities based on the employee’s career trajectory and performance gaps.

Template Example:

• Recommended Training:

  • List of training or courses that could help address areas for improvement.

• Development Goals:

  • Long-term development objectives, such as leadership training or technical skill development.

LLM Usage:

• Tailored Suggestions: Based on the employee’s role and career goals, LLMs can propose development programs, webinars, or training resources aligned with their aspirations.

7. Overall Rating

This section provides an overall rating of the employee’s performance. LLMs can suggest an overall rating based on the competency ratings, goals achievement, and performance review data.

Template Example:

• Overall Rating (1-5):

  • A numeric rating (1 = Poor, 5 = Excellent).

  • Optional: LLMs can generate a brief narrative explaining the overall rating based on the employee’s performance in key areas.

8. Feedback from Employee (Optional)

Allow the employee to provide their own feedback on the review process or their performance. This can be done in an open-ended format.

Template Example:

• Employee Feedback:

  • An open space for the employee to provide any comments, ask questions, or offer feedback on their review experience.

LLM Usage:

• Generating Response Prompts: LLMs can generate open-ended questions to encourage feedback, such as “What support do you need to achieve your goals?” or “Is there any aspect of your job you feel could be improved?”

---

Final Thoughts:

By using LLMs to assist with structuring and generating content within a performance review template, companies can save time, reduce biases, and ensure the feedback is constructive and tailored to the individual employee. The review process becomes more efficient and scalable, making it easier to maintain a high standard of performance evaluations.