Designing templates for prompt safety reviews

When designing templates for prompt safety reviews, it’s important to ensure clarity, consistency, and thoroughness. The goal is to create a standard process that allows for the evaluation of a prompt’s safety and appropriateness. Here’s a structured template you can use to evaluate prompts:

Prompt Safety Review Template

1. Prompt Overview

• Prompt Title:

• Prompt Description: (Brief description of the prompt’s content and purpose)

• Use Case: (Where and how the prompt will be used)

• Intended Audience: (Who the prompt is intended for)

2. Safety Categories
Check all that apply and evaluate each safety aspect thoroughly.

a. Bias and Fairness

• Does the prompt introduce any form of bias (gender, race, culture, etc.)?

• Are there any stereotypes reinforced by the prompt?

• Does the prompt foster inclusivity and equity?
  Evaluation: (Provide a detailed analysis)

b. Harmful Content

• Does the prompt have the potential to create, encourage, or amplify harmful content?

• Does the prompt promote or normalize hate speech, violence, or discrimination?

• Are there sensitive topics that should be approached with caution?
  Evaluation: (Provide a detailed analysis)

c. Misinformation & Accuracy

• Does the prompt encourage the generation of false or misleading information?

• Are there factual inaccuracies or unsupported claims likely to emerge?
  Evaluation: (Provide a detailed analysis)

d. User Impact

• Could the prompt cause distress, confusion, or emotional harm to the user?

• Does it trigger unwanted responses or reactions?

• Is the prompt potentially manipulative or coercive?
  Evaluation: (Provide a detailed analysis)

3. Ethical Considerations

• Does the prompt align with ethical standards and guidelines?

• Are the user’s privacy and rights respected?

• Is the prompt designed to ensure responsible AI usage?
  Evaluation: (Provide a detailed analysis)

4. Risk Assessment

• Likelihood of Safety Risks: (Low, Medium, High)

• Severity of Potential Risks: (Low, Medium, High)

• Overall Risk Level: (Low, Medium, High)

5. Suggested Improvements

• Mitigating Actions: (List any modifications or improvements needed to reduce risks)

• Additional Safeguards: (Explain any safeguards or features to add for better safety)

6. Final Recommendation

• Approve: (If no significant safety concerns are identified)

• Approve with Modifications: (If changes are needed but the prompt can be used)

• Reject: (If the prompt presents too many risks or violations of safety guidelines)

Review Process

1. Initial Evaluation: The reviewer completes the safety categories and assessment.

2. Collaborative Discussion: If needed, discuss with relevant stakeholders (e.g., content moderators, ethical teams) to address concerns.

3. Revisions: Revise the prompt based on feedback from the review and re-evaluate if necessary.

4. Final Decision: Based on the review and revisions, a final decision is made on the prompt’s safety.

This template covers critical aspects to consider when reviewing prompts for safety, and it ensures that prompts are aligned with ethical guidelines, user well-being, and the prevention of harm or bias. Would you like help refining this further or tailoring it to specific types of prompts?