AI tools have the potential to reduce students’ ability to develop structured arguments by offering them quick solutions to problems, which can be tempting for students who are looking for efficiency. While AI can be a helpful resource, it often provides pre-formed answers, diminishing the need for students to critically engage with a topic, analyze different viewpoints, and form their own reasoned arguments.
The challenge comes when students rely on AI-generated content without engaging in the thought process necessary for argumentation. Developing a structured argument involves critical thinking, research, and the ability to synthesize information, skills that are honed through the practice of constructing arguments from scratch. If AI does too much of the cognitive heavy lifting, students may not develop these essential skills fully.
Moreover, AI lacks the capacity for personal insight and understanding of nuance that comes with human thought processes. This makes it more challenging for students to learn how to address counterarguments, evaluate sources, and create well-rounded perspectives on complex issues.
To mitigate this, students need to be encouraged to use AI tools as supplements rather than substitutes. They should be guided to critically engage with the material, ensuring that they can still practice the necessary skills that AI cannot replace—such as developing original thought, recognizing bias, and constructing coherent and compelling arguments.
Leave a Reply