Creating architecture for per-request variance

Creating an architecture for per-request variance involves designing a system that can handle dynamic, request-specific variations or changes based on different input conditions. This is particularly useful in scenarios where requests may have unique requirements, such as in customizable services, configuration-driven applications, or adaptive business logic systems.

Here’s a breakdown of how to architect such a system:

1. Define the Request Variance Model

• Identify Variance Parameters: Determine the key parameters that can change per request. This could be anything from user preferences, geographic location, device type, and time of day, to specific configurations or dynamic data inputs.

• Create Variance Profiles: Develop profiles that represent different request types and their respective variations. For example, a web request might have a variance based on the device type (desktop vs mobile), while an API request might vary based on user role or API keys.

• Request Context: Include contextual data in each request (like user session data or headers) that can be used to determine the variance.

2. Design Request Flow

• Initial Request Handling: When a request comes in, it first enters a standard request processing pipeline.

• Variance Detection: As part of the processing pipeline, include a variance detection step. This could be a middleware that inspects the request for variance markers (e.g., headers, query parameters, or session information).

• Variance Mapping: Map the request variance to a predefined set of rules or conditions. This could involve looking up a configuration or rule set that describes how to modify or adapt the processing for the specific request.

3. Modularize Variance Logic

• Separation of Concerns: Modularize variance logic into small, maintainable components. For example:

  • User-specific Variance: Logic that customizes behavior based on user data.

  • Geographical Variance: Adjusts processing based on the user’s geographic location.

  • Device or Platform-specific Variance: Changes behavior depending on the request source (e.g., mobile vs desktop).

• Rule Engine or Decision Tree: Implement a rule engine or decision tree that dynamically applies variance logic. This can be configured via a flexible rules file or service that can be modified without affecting the core system.

4. Storage of Variance Data

• State Management: Consider how you’ll manage the state of variance. For example, if a user’s session triggers a variance, you might need to store that in a session database or cache. This could be a database, key-value store, or in-memory cache (e.g., Redis).

• Persistent Configuration: Store configuration rules, dynamic data, or variance profiles in a persistent storage system (e.g., database or configuration management tool). This allows the variance logic to be changed without needing to redeploy the system.

5. Processing Request Variance

• Custom Processing Steps: Based on the identified variance, trigger custom processing steps. This can include:

  • Adjusting Business Logic: Depending on the variance, the business logic might change (e.g., offering a different discount for users from a certain region).

  • Altering Output Format: For APIs, the output might be customized based on variance parameters (e.g., returning a different data structure based on user preferences).

  • Tailored Content: In web applications, the variance might lead to different HTML being returned depending on the device type or user preferences.

6. Caching Variance Results

• Efficient Caching: Since certain variance results might repeat for different requests, caching is crucial. Use a cache system that supports key-based invalidation and dynamic data storage.

• Conditional Caching: Implement caching that varies based on request parameters. For example, cache different versions of a resource based on user preferences, locale, or device.

7. Scalability Considerations

• Load Balancing: Ensure that your architecture can handle high loads while applying per-request variance logic. Load balancing can distribute requests across multiple servers, ensuring that any server can apply the variance logic independently.

• Distributed Systems: If your system is distributed, ensure the variance detection and processing logic can scale horizontally across multiple services or microservices.

• Rate Limiting: If variance leads to complex processing (e.g., custom logic that takes longer), implement rate limiting to prevent service degradation.

8. Testing and Validation

• Unit Testing for Variance: Create unit tests that validate different variance scenarios. This will ensure that each request’s specific requirements are handled correctly.

• Performance Testing: Since per-request variance can lead to added complexity, run performance benchmarks to ensure that the system scales appropriately under load.

• Error Handling: Implement robust error handling for cases where variance detection fails or if the system cannot handle a specific type of request.

9. Example Architecture Diagram

Here’s a high-level architecture to visualize this process:

css
CopyEdit
[Client Request] → [Request Router] → [Variance Detection Middleware]
                                  → [Variance Mapping (Profile Lookup)]
                                  → [Customized Business Logic]
                                  → [Data Fetching (with Variance Handling)]
                                  → [Response Output (tailored)]

10. Tools & Technologies

• Middleware: You could use middleware or API gateway services to apply the variance logic dynamically.

• Rule Engines: If your system requires dynamic rule evaluation (e.g., Drools, or custom rule engines).

• Caching: Redis or Memcached for caching.

• Databases: SQL or NoSQL databases to store and retrieve configuration or user-specific variance data.

• Cloud Services: Using services like AWS Lambda or Azure Functions can help implement scalable per-request variance logic.

11. Best Practices

• Separation of Concerns: Keep variance logic separate from core business logic. Use strategies like microservices or function-based approaches to isolate the variance logic.

• Avoid Tight Coupling: Ensure that the variance logic is modular and does not tightly couple with the main application flow.

• Minimize Complexity: Try to keep the variance handling as simple and predictable as possible. If variance introduces too much complexity, consider simplifying the variance logic.

This architecture can scale across multiple layers and be flexible enough to handle a wide variety of request types and variations dynamically.